Singapore may be having its first test at religious harmony now that one of our citizens has died in the hands of a Muslim militant.
The country has long understood the importance of understanding each other’s faith. We know that in the backdrop of global religious tensions, the ability to maintain rationality is the country’s best defence. We comprehend how terror is usually perpetrated by those who understand the religion least. This is why we have efforts like inter-faith dialogues and discourses on religions.
But these proclamations of religious harmony have so far been done from a safe, insulated distance. The nation has never experienced a terrorist attack, nor have any of our citizens died in the hands terrorists killing in the name of religion. Till last week.
28-year-old Singaporean lawyer Low Hwei Yen died after being shot twice during the Mumbai hostage ordeal. She was in the city to attend a one-day business seminar. Her captors have openly claimed the siege as an act of vengeance for oppressed Muslims all over the world, particularly in India. Singapore has experienced her first casualty in the hands of a Muslim militant.
The response by Singaporeans has understandably been vocal. Outpouring of grief has been forthcoming on and off the Internet. Others took this opportunity to espouse the much repeated cliché on how we must never let our guard down against terror. But what has been noticeably absent was any discussion on the perpetrators’ backgrounds and the fact that these deviants have killed yet again in the name of Islam.
Perhaps Singaporeans are being polite by avoiding religiously-charged topics. Or it could be that the nation is still reeling in the anger and grief over the lost of an innocent life at its prime.
But somehow I want to believe that the absence of castigations against Muslims in the backdrop of this senseless murder is scant evidence that Singaporeans have truly understood the fact that terrorism is not sanctioned by Islam. Trivialities such as the religion of the attackers may have been ignored in the understanding that they have committed these murders in defiance of the Quran and its commandments. If this is the case, then our efforts at cultivating religious harmony may have produced its first fruit in the form of this silence. If this is the case, then we have passed our first test at religious harmony. Or did we?
Irregardless, Muslims in Singapore must continue its effort in condemning these barbarous acts. We cannot continue to take on the current muted stance and take it for granted that the rest of our fellow citizens would understand every time murder is committed in the name of Islam.
The voice of practising Muslims is still barely audible amongst the clutter of deviant clerics and religious fanatics who are way to keen to disperse hate. If we continue this silence, we risk a time where wayward voices are taken as being representative of Islam.
Muslims, especially the ones here in Singapore, need to put in more effort to assure our fellow citizens and dispel the misconceptions that they may have with regards to our religion. This is especially so when radical Islam is on a rise in many parts of the world. Patience and understanding does have its limits and there will come a point of time where the country needs a fresh assurance from the local Muslims that we do not share the perverted views of the radicals.
Singapore Muslims strongly condemn acts of terror that has been committed in the name of Islam. Our grief is with the families of innocents who lost their and we stand shoulder to shoulder with all Singaporeans to defend our homeland against terror.
Please have a look at my other post titled “Religion of Peace: If Islam is really such a peaceful religion, then why does the Quran seem so violent?”
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Salam. You know, in imho those deviant clerics with their crazy fanatical followers spouting all kinds of fatwas make the news because they are just that - crazy.
ReplyDeleteStrangely enough, I don't feel like I had to defend my religion to the people around me in the latest tragic event. Maybe I am already desensitised. Maybe I have talked about how Islam is a peaceful religion to those I know. And maybe, just maybe, those who still questioned my stand on terrorism - regardless of which god the terrorists invoke - have taken their leave from my social circle.
Muslims in Singapore practise alot of self-censorship. We do not question or comment on religious issues but leave it to the higher authorities (eg: MUIS). This top-down method of disseminating information may result in misinterpretation and misunderstandings abt the religion. Muslims, as individuals, need to be more proactive rather than just relying on the authority.
ReplyDeleteLets talk about growing teens with hot blood.......easily to be way laid by unscrupulous elders.
ReplyDeleteThere is a difference in attitude between teenagers on those who read thru the quran.
One that haven't read thru the quran tend to be more humble and modest ie. when his feet was accidently step by someone,he too apologise to the one who step on him....... comparing another teen who read thru the quran, just overnight.........when his feet was accidently stepped.....he may retailated with his tit-for-tat attitude taught by the quran.
This is the root of the problem among ppl who are too serious with religious belief
We are all Singaporeans, should come together to fight for this crime. I strongly beleive that no religion will want their followers to be gunmen. Casualty list shows all races and religion.
ReplyDeleteLet me put it plain and simple for you:
ReplyDeleteThe lady died because she is from Singapore. Singapore is known to align this country to US and Israel. If she was from Malaysia or Indonesia, both Muslim countries she would still be alive today. Heck, she should have just said she is from Malaysia and she will still be alive today.
The Singapore brand name killed her. Plain and simple.
i disagree with the above post.
ReplyDeletewhile i do not send my condolences to the girl who died, (in singlish, i don't know her, she don't know me, she could have lived till 80 and discovered that husband has extra-marital affair, and is a closet gay/etc, and which could have been worse? honestly, i don't know nor do i care. but i know that we should not take up more than 1 day of reporting of her on national press) and dying in a trip is as probable as drowning in chicken rice soup, shit/unfortunate events as we know are equally distributed.
i also know that quite a bit singaporeans would know repeat the mantra, singapore safest, singapore safest... (they obviously have not seen the Streets of gambling den in geylang)
That said, i don't think if it's right to say that the singapore brand killed her, afterall, do u think if she were to bring out a palestine 'passport' it would save her?
those guys are out to kill, and if they have the time, to rape and kill.
so let's not delude ourselves that if she has any links to muslims just in terms of passport/nationality, it would save her skin. afterall, they picked india to attack, and india is not the most deserted place in terms of muslim population) I hope i explained clearly for your comprehension.
to reinforce the above point, if they just want to kill non-muslims, i believe they should pick a place someway like Finland? where obviously, u would need lots of luck to hit muslims compared to the chance u have when u do your kill operation in india... so, i hope u get the point, it's just a "let's just whack!" mission and those guys picked that place, probably because that's the best place they have access to too... no?
i don't blame those muslims for behaving how they behave.
why?
read the quran in its english translation, and u would feel it's the more authoritative version of christianity, and is pretty much similar to the style of the jews. yes yes, till the end of my and your days, jews and muslims are like left and right hands, except they just have the in-born need to hurt each other, though there's more similarity between a jew and muslim than a jew / muslim and say a hindu or zen buddhist or hare krishna or .... fill in the blanks yourselves.
in short, u get the 'moderate muslims' as our friend ridzwan defined, killing people, simply because... maybe it's you are what you read / expose yourself to... but definitely, you are what you think.
anyway, don't take it that i am hostile to muslims. i am not against the people, i am just against the doctrine. you can't blame the people who read the book, cause it's a culture thing, it's a matter of rituality. I prefer to blame the source. it's just a peculiar middle east trait, pretty screwed up, look at the other products of middle east schools, christianity, jews, very similar to islam too.
anyway, i just want to post that this is the best time to set up a protest
yes, do a 100 man.girl protest. do it say outside , maybe hong lim park, and bring swords, make sure they are blunt.
and stage WE ARE AGAINST MUSLIMS TERRORISTS.
and that would score brownie points for the community.
the muslims on this forum has been bitching that the chinks have been racist to them in treatment.
i say, if u mean what u say, do what i wrote, that way, it would bridge between people of different skin / religion / mindsets.
afterall we all know this,
universally, this applies,
love heals, religions divide.
i prefer to focus on what unites...